“This isn’t just about one property,” Fitzpatrick said in the post. “It’s about ensuring our community’s future is shaped by the people who call it home. Too often, we’ve seen development advance without fully accounting for long-term consequences to the environment, infrastructure, and quality of life. I’ve long advocated for a better approach: one that prioritizes thoughtful planning and the voices of the people most affected.”
The zoning board did drop the number of approved units from 16 to 15 in a move one member said would “throw a bone” to concerned citizens. The project has to clear several more levels of approval before construction begins.
The sort of local opposition to proposed development seen in Lower Makefield isn’t uncommon. But it’s notable that a member of Congress became involved in the dispute, especially given the small size of the 3.5-acre proposal, which represents a drop in the bucket for the overall housing stock in the Lower Bucks County township.
In addition to sending a representative to the zoning board meeting on Tuesday, Fitzpatrick met with concerned neighbors, visited the site, and penned a letter to the Environmental Protection Agency asking officials to look into environmental and traffic concerns.
The episode offers a window into the ways the Republican lawmaker, who represents purple Bucks County and a sliver of Montgomery County, engages with local communities across his district even as he often avoids local media.
Fitzpatrick’s office has a pattern of engaging on environmental issues in Bucks County. He has asked the EPA to intervene in the review of a pipeline leak in Upper Makefield, he supported efforts to fight a natural gas compressor in West Rockhill, and urged the closure of Rockhill Quarry after asbestos was discovered.
In recent months, Fitzpatrick has promoted his interventions for Lower and Upper Makefield on his social media accounts, pointing to it as proof of his commitment to his constituents.
And that’s how Kyle Melander, district director for Fitzpatrick, presented the efforts in Tuesday night’s meeting, criticizing the developer as callous and dismissive of resident concerns and insisting that this is the congressman’s pattern.
“Whenever a concern is brought … the congressman always advocates regardless of the matter,” Melander said.
But the developer’s attorney, Jeffrey Garton, suggested the congressman came with ulterior motives — to earn votes.
“If there weren’t 250 voters, would you be here tonight?” Garton asked, referencing a petition that nearly 300 residents had signed seeking the delay of the zoning board decision or a denial of the developer’s request.
Fitzpatrick, who represents a district President Donald Trump lost, will be among the top targets for national Democrats in next year’s election.
During the zoning hearing, developers painted a picture of a project that would match the neighboring community, enhance stormwater treatment in the area, and provide natural barriers to neighbors concerned about the development’s proximity to their homes. Essentially, they argued, concerns of neighbors should act as no barrier to the project moving forward and appropriate studies would be conducted to address many of the residents’ environmental and flooding worries.